See the Dorset Yacht case to understand the duty and obligation! The reason why we sue the Queen's minister is because she set the job description. Suing her is like Suing yourself who is the other party to the contract. She obligated her minister to fulfill a duty and the failure to fulfill the duty is a criminal offence contrary to the Queen's peace and her good intention which is your good intention. The failure to fulfill the duty is misfeasance in public office. You may mention her as the person in Right to address the government that is your government as a matter of formality who is the other party to the contract that is sitting beside you in contractual nexus; you! It's YOU! The problem is that the Queen and those who meditate upon her royalty; those who envision themselves as holding that magnanimous office want to be sure that she cannot be sued or that the office cannot be sued. As a human being, in this Westminster parliamentary, system she cannot be sued. But, her agents can be. It is within her jurisprudence. Maybe she wrote it. The good laws confirm also the good intention and that she is much like a manager writing programs that are certain to work for the greater good when they and her management is respected or she is the Monarchy of Chaos if they don't as some people would prefer to propose a "free money" sign be posted at every bank instead of following the basic income policy. She is not the Queen of Chaos and every employee is subject to her evident,written disposition as to her intention for peace, order and good government. You wanted to know what happens if you don't action Article 25 of the UDHR in the most efficient way possible. She is not damned by you in public office or you in a job purporting to serve the Crown and Court. She has survived your resistance before. There will be peace and order in her realms and dominions; it does say!!.

See the  Dorset Yacht case to understand the duty and obligation! The reason why we sue the Queen's minister is because she set the job description. Suing her is like Suing yourself who is the other party to the contract. She obligated her minister to fulfill a duty and the failure to fulfill the duty is a criminal  offence contrary to the Queen's peace and her good intention which is your good intention.  The failure to fulfill the duty is misfeasance in public office. You may mention her as the person in Right to address the government that is your government as a matter of formality who is the other party to the contract that is sitting beside you in contractual nexus; you!  It's YOU!  The problem is that the Queen and those who meditate upon her royalty; those who envision themselves as holding that magnanimous office want to be sure that she cannot be sued or that the office cannot be sued. As a human being, in this Westminster parliamentary, system she  cannot be sued. But, her agents can be. It is within her jurisprudence. Maybe she wrote it.  The good laws confirm also the good intention and that she is much like a manager writing programs that are certain  to work for the greater good when they and her management is respected or she is the Monarchy of Chaos if they don't as some people would prefer to propose a "free money" sign be posted at every bank instead of following the basic income policy. She is not the Queen of Chaos and every employee is subject to her evident,written disposition as to her intention for peace, order and good government. You wanted to know what happens if you don't action Article 25 of the UDHR in the most efficient way possible. She is not damned by you in public office or you in a job purporting to serve the Crown and  Court. She has survived your resistance before. There will be peace and order in her realms and dominions; it does say!!.