This is the answer again. Elevator man; there isn't any. It is automated. You were waiting for someone to hand chicken to you from the kitchen or some fish at the backdoor of Stoke Park where you used to live and work in the estate. It is now a golf course; with membership for the association. Then, you were moved off the estate forcibly and you did not want to go. What would you do? The horse was given tools harnessed to the hoo and then they did not need the human labor to pick the field. You pick the bank when you should have automated health that has to begin with a basic income at a minimum of $25000.00 per annum and this will cause you to budget; ain't it? That's okay. We need consumers. But, you are no longer needed at Stoke Park. You are no longer needed at Honda; I mean G.M. But , you have rights and a politician who is to uphold them. Can you tolerate him if he asks again if the UDHR is Domestic Law and if basic income is the means of ensuring the guaranteed rights pursuant to what is Domestic law under the Constitution? Maybe he is forgiven because he is learning difficulty and is given extra time to solve the problem that necessitates you asking for "seven" at the bank. In the meantime, your sister is dead in a Condo squatter game for Mischief to property when she had $20,000.00 basic income as a citizen West of Hamilton that is provided to Jehovah Witness followers only; so we are told and some Anglicans.
This is the answer again. Elevator man; there isn't any. It is automated. You were waiting for someone to hand chicken to you from the kitchen or some fish at the backdoor of Stoke Park where you used to live and work in the estate. It is now a golf course; with membership for the association. Then, you were moved off the estate forcibly and you did not want to go. What would you do? The horse was given tools harnessed to the hoo and then they did not need the human labor to pick the field. You pick the bank when you should have automated health that has to begin with a basic income at a minimum of $25000.00 per annum and this will cause you to budget; ain't it? That's okay. We need consumers. But, you are no longer needed at Stoke Park. You are no longer needed at Honda; I mean G.M. But , you have rights and a politician who is to uphold them. Can you tolerate him if he asks again if the UDHR is Domestic Law and if basic income is the means of ensuring the guaranteed rights pursuant to what is Domestic law under the Constitution? Maybe he is forgiven because he is learning difficulty and is given extra time to solve the problem that necessitates you asking for "seven" at the bank. In the meantime, your sister is dead in a Condo squatter game for Mischief to property when she had $20,000.00 basic income as a citizen West of Hamilton that is provided to Jehovah Witness followers only; so we are told and some Anglicans.
Comments
Post a Comment