The real truth about post modernity and the endless, sometimes, meaningful discussions is that the discussions are fueled by emotion but emotions centred on change but the changes for the most part are centred on the role of the human being in direct relationship to work place technology. It could not involve the role of the mother or father in life or the central place of family in our society. These are unchanging. As such, post modernity is a discussion that is very popular in some societies where they have not committed to the role of the human being or the value of human life; where the role of the human being is a focal point of the discussion although that key role for the human being in society is also unchanging. It may not be a discussion on other societies while other societies may still discuss their experiences with technology as the new humanless order taker. Yet, the North American spends a lot of time discussing his emotions in the absence of the certainty of his own role as the key focal point of his society as citizen and human being with basic income although he is contractually, legally and purposefully the the focal point; the raison d'etre. Warren. Lyon. The real truth about post modernity and the endless, sometimes, meaningful discussions is that the discussions are fueled by emotion but emotions centred on change but the changes for the most part are centred on the role of the human being in direct relationship to work place technology. It could not involve the role of the mother or father in life or the central place of family in our society. As such, post modernity is a discussion that is very popular where the role of the human being is a discussion. It may not be a discussion on other societies while other societies may still discuss their experiences with technology as the new humanless order taker. Yet, the North American spends a lot of time discussing his emotions in the absence of the certainty of his own role as the key focal point of his society as citizen and human being with basic income although he is contractually, legally and purposefully the the focal point; the raison d'etre with basic income which is the rule in spite of the displacing role of technology that replaces humans in the work force with technology but it does displace the human from society or the landscape. While basic income is the rule, the real question is what happens when there are rule breakers. You get a plethora of displacement experiences in society but of the kind that makes the hyper discussions about post modernity very evident with tangible evidence; the evidence being the panic, but only in North America it would seem, about family and the meaning of the simplest concepts of society that would involve family itself with children, grand parents and great grand family. Once we find the rule breakers who are challenging the obvious rule involving basic income, Western Judeo, Herodian,Christian, Catholic society can return from death to life instead of feeding on the anxiety caused by a society in self induced asphyxiation over the meaning of one human life or the meaning of oneself in post modernity. This anxiety of society self-induced debacle over the meaning of one human life is not the experience in Japan; nor is it the experience in Russia, Ireland, Germany or France. Certainly, it should not be the experience any where in the world. Every nation that is a flag bearing nation is a UN nation and there are rules to be followed in terms of human rights that are also quite purposeful in managing and enjoying a post modern robotic labor economy. Walter Reuther's discussion about how to address the displaced worker following automation is evidence of the on going violations of UN human rights laws in America. The experience of the workers who were made redundant in Reuther's time along with the experience of their families is evidence of the UN violations concerning the average American. Yet, retraining and relocation are evident solutions but if the population had basic income, the worker would not have to relocate in hoping to find work else where. The discussion about Post Modernism continues but the role of the human being or the family is a non issue in terms of importance along with the central, pivotal role in society itself. This is understood and once understood, the panic in the post modern discussion goes away while the role of technology to monitor and assess how we eat our food in the privacy of our homes will continue as the smart TV is watching as well as the x box and Alexa also; but of course. Warren. Lyon.

The real truth about post modernity and the endless, sometimes, meaningful discussions is that the discussions are fueled by emotion but emotions centred on change but the changes for the most part are centred on the role of the human being in direct relationship to work place technology. It could not involve the role of the mother or father in life or the central place of family in our society. These are unchanging.  As such, post modernity is a discussion that is very popular in some societies where they have not committed to the role of the human being or the value of human life;  where the role of the human being is a focal point of the discussion although that  key role for the human being  in society is also unchanging.    It may not be a discussion on other societies while other societies may still discuss their experiences with technology as the new humanless order taker.   Yet, the North American spends a lot of time discussing his emotions in the absence of the certainty of his own role as the key focal point of his society as citizen and human being with basic income although he is contractually, legally and purposefully the the focal point; the raison d'etre.
Warren. Lyon.
The real truth about post modernity and the endless, sometimes, meaningful discussions is that the discussions are fueled by emotion but emotions centred on change but the changes for the most part are centred on the role of the human being in direct relationship to work place technology. It could not involve the role of the mother or father in life or the central place of family in our society. As such, post modernity is a discussion that is very popular where the role of the human being is a discussion. It may not be a discussion on other societies while other societies may still discuss their experiences with technology as the new humanless order taker.   Yet, the North American spends a lot of time discussing his emotions in the absence of the certainty of his own role as the key focal point of his society as citizen and human being with basic income although he is contractually, legally and purposefully the the focal point; the raison d'etre with basic income  which is the rule in spite of the displacing role of technology that replaces humans in the work force with technology  but it does displace the human  from society or the landscape. 
While basic income is the rule, the real question is what happens when there are rule breakers.  You get a plethora of displacement experiences in society but of the kind that makes the hyper discussions about post modernity very evident with tangible evidence; the evidence being the panic,  but only in North  America it would seem, about family and the meaning of the simplest concepts of society that would involve family itself with children, grand parents and great grand family.  Once we find the rule breakers who are challenging the obvious rule involving basic income, Western Judeo, Herodian,Christian, Catholic  society can return from death to  life instead of feeding on the anxiety caused by a society in self induced asphyxiation over the meaning of one human life or the meaning of  oneself in post modernity. This anxiety of society self-induced debacle   over the meaning of one human life is not the experience in Japan; nor is it the experience in Russia, Ireland, Germany or France.  Certainly,  it should not be the experience any where in the world. Every nation that is a flag bearing nation is a UN nation and there are rules to be followed in terms of human rights that are also quite purposeful in managing and enjoying a post modern robotic labor economy. Walter Reuther's discussion about how to address the displaced worker following automation is evidence of the on going violations of UN human rights laws in America.  The experience of the workers who were made redundant in Reuther's time along with the experience of their families is evidence of the UN violations concerning the average American.  Yet, retraining and relocation are evident solutions but if the population had basic income, the worker would not have to relocate in hoping to find work else where. The discussion about Post Modernism continues but the role of the human being or the family is a non issue in terms of importance along with the central, pivotal role in society itself. This is understood and once understood, the panic in the post modern discussion goes away while the role of technology to monitor and assess how we eat our food in the privacy of our homes will continue as the smart TV is watching as well as the x box and Alexa also; but of course.
Warren. Lyon.