Ironically in 1767, onerous and burdensome legislation affecting the cost of a British shipment of goods To colonial America would have led to two responses. The first response is anger and the second response is the colonial development of home grown industry as to American tea profusion and the production and the organised cultivation of other products. Conflict ensued once the affect of the acts set in and by 1774 there was open conflict. The question that followed was the justice of the system of rule. Could English soldiers kill Americans with immunity? The King's Men of that era were a group of individuals in Boston who advocated for a judgement that would be confirmation of such Immunity. Quincy Adams argues for the right to Amerindians to be protected under the law and to be safeguarded from a plan of any kind , even if it is a delayed solution, that slowly but surely exterminated The population. See the law of delay in relation to basic income not being applied universally in North America. People should not have to move from location to location to find a compliant UN safe haven with basic income. All the people regardless of complexion will be used as mules of consumption; mules of consumer activity. There are some minority groups as aboriginals based on complexion who may be relegated to this status more than others as there should not be covert self imposed limitations working against ones own community in a unusual negation of possibility that says I will tell my children to believe they can do anything but I need to have all the glory and resist anyone a little younger or older who is remotely related who followed my assertions about being able to do anything. Evidently, racism from other complexion groups still exists while tribal affiliation is evident as people migrate to one of the most forsaken and poisoned parts of the world. Let us be clear that any "Kingsman" plot to extort a judgement from the Court and hijack the Court's freedom to maintain its existing judgement is contempt of Court and violation of an existing Court order.

Ironically in 1767, onerous and burdensome legislation affecting the cost of a British shipment of goods To colonial America would have led to two responses. The first response is anger and the second response is the colonial  development of home grown industry as to American  tea profusion and the production  and the organised cultivation of other products.  Conflict ensued once the affect of the acts set in and by 1774 there was open conflict. The question that followed was the justice of the system of rule.  Could English soldiers kill Americans with immunity?  The King's Men of that era were a group of individuals in Boston who advocated for a judgement that would be confirmation of such Immunity. Quincy Adams argues for the right to Amerindians to be protected under the law and to be safeguarded from a plan of any kind , even if it is a delayed solution, that slowly but surely exterminated The population.  See the law of delay in relation to basic income not being applied  universally in North America.  People should not have to move from location to location to find a compliant UN safe haven with basic income.   All the people regardless of complexion will be used as mules of consumption; mules of consumer activity.  There are some minority groups as aboriginals based on complexion who may be relegated to this status more than others as there should not be covert self imposed limitations working against ones own community in a unusual negation of possibility that says I will tell my children to believe they can do anything but I need to have all the glory and resist anyone  a little younger or older who is  remotely related who followed my assertions about being able to do anything.  Evidently, racism from other complexion groups still exists while tribal affiliation is evident as people migrate to one of the most forsaken and poisoned parts of the world.  Let us be clear that any "Kingsman" plot  to extort a  judgement from the Court and hijack the Court's freedom to maintain its existing judgement is contempt of Court and violation of an existing Court order.