We see the coalescence of grievances after 1901 and the emergence of mechanised industrialism. There are many grievances and one good solution; the basic income. The issue we see here in North America is that a leader of some kind who emerges in a grievance group surfaces from the vomit that he is with an unusual collection of crimes against society and his own community in a search for authority and a solution to the desperation that much of America is in lived experience and is then placed into politics and in spite of the evident solution, if you vote for them the solution is put aside as everyone is judged as guilty. Bill Cinkyton is an example. Nazism is really a branding and grouping of the grievances in addition to a residual indentured servant and late arrival dna around the world that could look like any movie star but of asked if they would like to school, they would probably say no while school is important for socialising and understanding how to avoid anti - social behaviour. After abandoning four properties with or without education as an Amerindian Law itself and property ownership is your grievance. But, if you've been white and superior all this time in not attending school, then you are superior when the Black and Brown people have to go to school. So, this self imposed war on Amerindian humanity is a territorial and communal resistance of one's settledness in a global human family. You call the basic income concept European, you are set in resisting Europe and then you don't implement the program while there is cash earmarked for the program but then where is the cash while people password away and fall into gaps between human dignity, human need and the law in the face of various government's legal obligations at the International Criminal Court and under the United Nations Charter. I am very very sorry sir but...the UDHR is mandatory and you are guilty of human rights offences while you ask what aspect of article 25 requires direct cash payment yet the article requires a response; an efficient response of some kind.
We see the coalescence of grievances after 1901 and the emergence of mechanised industrialism. There are many grievances and one good solution; the basic income. The issue we see here in North America is that a leader of some kind who emerges in a grievance group surfaces from the vomit that he is with an unusual collection of crimes against society and his own community in a search for authority and a solution to the desperation that much of America is in lived experience and is then placed into politics and in spite of the evident solution, if you vote for them the solution is put aside as everyone is judged as guilty. Bill Cinkyton is an example. Nazism is really a branding and grouping of the grievances in addition to a residual indentured servant and late arrival dna around the world that could look like any movie star but of asked if they would like to school, they would probably say no while school is important for socialising and understanding how to avoid anti - social behaviour. After abandoning four properties with or without education as an Amerindian Law itself and property ownership is your grievance. But, if you've been white and superior all this time in not attending school, then you are superior when the Black and Brown people have to go to school. So, this self imposed war on Amerindian humanity is a territorial and communal resistance of one's settledness in a global human family. You call the basic income concept European, you are set in resisting Europe and then you don't implement the program while there is cash earmarked for the program but then where is the cash while people password away and fall into gaps between human dignity, human need and the law in the face of various government's legal obligations at the International Criminal Court and under the United Nations Charter. I am very very sorry sir but...the UDHR is mandatory and you are guilty of human rights offences while you ask what aspect of article 25 requires direct cash payment yet the article requires a response; an efficient response of some kind.
Comments
Post a Comment