As all other UK/EU Law graduates know, the graduate is irrelevant as a graduate but not as a UK/UN citizen while it is evident that not all politicians are graduates although the laws of the UK/EU and the UN put government ministers and employees under a duty that subjects them to arrest whether or not they have education. What is happening to Windrush British subjects who were subjects of the Queen before arrival in the UK is a sacking offense. She or he should be sacked. Is she or he a nazi or something? Brexit is a brilliant idea. But, what about the UK's commitment to basic income under the UDHR's article 25? The UK will be much more like Sweden or other non EU nations; small, tiny, focused on it self and able to nurture its people with some consistent UDHR policy application that resonates a starched shirt on or t shirt with the apostolic creed or pocket size Tanakh in pocket while enjoying a pint with coconut Thai soup at the local pub. Yet, there will be no freedom of movement of people and goods. But, who would want to go to France or Belgium without a visa in any event? The Irish citizens who live in the Republic of Ireland remain EU citizens. Maybe the UK will spend more time trying to rediscover their English identity as they eat kebabs and sushi from people born in England although they are not white. Is English synonymous with white? No; but some people believe it should be but if the English had basic income comparable to the Asians and Turkish and the Bulgarians, Iranians or Bosnians, maybe they could be purveyors of more convenient fine English fare on the High Street that is a bit more open in concept emotionally to the public and serve a pint or two at the same time while the pub has not gone away whether or not it is owned by a Turkish Hotel owner, a Cypriot or a Jap. The real motivation in evident the sense of trepidation pushing for a rediscovery of identity, English identity, is circling on human value following the confirmation of the automating power of technology and its human impact, displacing humans from the work force but not devaluing humans since the human being is worth quite a lot as a consumer. Ask a Montenegrin how much he receives as basic income. It is Usd 70,000.00. Brexit is a brilliant idea to remove a confused and struggling population from the podium of global leadership since there are more people speaking English in Japan or China than in all of England who are also enjoying a compliant UDHR economy regardless of race unlike the English. There are more people speaking English in Mexico than in England which is another compliant economy. But, reducing its international facia of role and leadership may he'll England focus on its own unique dignity and allow it to follow a small and dignified Sweden or Norway; maybe also try to follow Germany with its non- racialised application of basic income under the UDHR and get away from any covert message to the world that says "English is white and if you are not white, I should be able to anything to you." This notion has been the under belly of the Maylay government whether she is aware of it or not but she is probably unaware of this embarrassing result. Most importantly, who has stopped the leader to say that what is happening is just not English? It is just not on mate no maybe a time out from this sense of evil dichotomy is best since "English" should be synonymous with something ecumenical with or without a piece of tandoori masala...in your mouth; understood? Good!
As all other UK/EU Law graduates know, the graduate is irrelevant as a graduate but not as a UK/UN citizen while it is evident that not all politicians are graduates although the laws of the UK/EU and the UN put government ministers and employees under a duty that subjects them to arrest whether or not they have education. What is happening to Windrush British subjects who were subjects of the Queen before arrival in the UK is a sacking offense. She or he should be sacked. Is she or he a nazi or something? Brexit is a brilliant idea. But, what about the UK's commitment to basic income under the UDHR's article 25? The UK will be much more like Sweden or other non EU nations; small, tiny, focused on it self and able to nurture its people with some consistent UDHR policy application that resonates a starched shirt on or t shirt with the apostolic creed or pocket size Tanakh in pocket while enjoying a pint with coconut Thai soup at the local pub. Yet, there will be no freedom of movement of people and goods. But, who would want to go to France or Belgium without a visa in any event? The Irish citizens who live in the Republic of Ireland remain EU citizens. Maybe the UK will spend more time trying to rediscover their English identity as they eat kebabs and sushi from people born in England although they are not white. Is English synonymous with white? No; but some people believe it should be but if the English had basic income comparable to the Asians and Turkish and the Bulgarians, Iranians or Bosnians, maybe they could be purveyors of more convenient fine English fare on the High Street that is a bit more open in concept emotionally to the public and serve a pint or two at the same time while the pub has not gone away whether or not it is owned by a Turkish Hotel owner, a Cypriot or a Jap. The real motivation in evident the sense of trepidation pushing for a rediscovery of identity, English identity, is circling on human value following the confirmation of the automating power of technology and its human impact, displacing humans from the work force but not devaluing humans since the human being is worth quite a lot as a consumer. Ask a Montenegrin how much he receives as basic income. It is Usd 70,000.00. Brexit is a brilliant idea to remove a confused and struggling population from the podium of global leadership since there are more people speaking English in Japan or China than in all of England who are also enjoying a compliant UDHR economy regardless of race unlike the English. There are more people speaking English in Mexico than in England which is another compliant economy. But, reducing its international facia of role and leadership may he'll England focus on its own unique dignity and allow it to follow a small and dignified Sweden or Norway; maybe also try to follow Germany with its non- racialised application of basic income under the UDHR and get away from any covert message to the world that says "English is white and if you are not white, I should be able to anything to you." This notion has been the under belly of the Maylay government whether she is aware of it or not but she is probably unaware of this embarrassing result. Most importantly, who has stopped the leader to say that what is happening is just not English? It is just not on mate no maybe a time out from this sense of evil dichotomy is best since "English" should be synonymous with something ecumenical with or without a piece of tandoori masala...in your mouth; understood? Good!
Comments
Post a Comment