The UDHR as to basic income and every other obligation to fulfill a citizen's requirements as outlined under the UDHR are outside of the realm of politics but within the unchanging non political mandate of any government as the ISO 9001 infrastructure obligations. Manufacturing is financed and the markets need buyers; purchasers who will purchase the finished product and will engage in all kinds of work if and when available. Yet, the economy will have sufficient stimulation with buyers who are enabled to buy and purchase goods with their basic income. The dichotomy in the world at present is that some countries in North America welcome refugees as required under UN law and provide the international citizen who seeks refugee protection every help under the UDHR such as housing, food, shelter and monies for their personal needs for many years until their application is accepted. After it is accepted, they enter a new realm of identity and start to learn how the North American provides less dignity to its citizens than what is provided to foreigners and it seems these foreigners do not stay very long in a world of automation, fewer regular job prospects and countries malformed by a non-committal to the UDHR. Could it be that some countries are unable to see that they spend more money honoring the UDHR when it concerns refugees than it spends on its citizens or the refugee as soon as he his granted a permanent stay?

The UDHR as to basic income and every other obligation to fulfill a citizen's requirements as outlined under the UDHR are outside of the realm of politics but within the unchanging non political mandate of any government as the ISO 9001 infrastructure obligations.  Manufacturing is financed and the markets need buyers; purchasers who will purchase the finished product and will engage in all kinds of work if and when available.  Yet, the economy will have sufficient stimulation with buyers who are enabled to buy and purchase goods with their basic income.    The dichotomy in the world at present is that some countries in North America welcome refugees as required under UN law and provide the international citizen who seeks  refugee protection every help under the UDHR such as housing, food, shelter and monies for their personal needs for many years until their application is accepted. After it is accepted, they enter a new realm of identity and start to learn how the North American provides less dignity to its citizens than what is provided to foreigners and it seems these foreigners do not stay very long in a world of automation, fewer regular job prospects  and countries malformed by a non-committal to the UDHR.  Could it be that some countries are unable to see that they spend more money honoring the UDHR when it concerns refugees than it spends on  its citizens or the refugee as soon as he his granted a permanent stay?   





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

Image

March 23rd, 2023. By Nathan and Kenneth Maslow-Naed. Incomplete There seems to be some kind of human Hegemony Totem poll going on involving income support. The English are at the bottom. You have to comply with the UDHR Article 25 but what method in terms of amounts would you implement to comply; how much do you say you will pay your culture per citizen? Are you English? Are you Canadian? All human life matters. Have you watched the Real House Wives of Durban? I think I am worth as a South African about $50,000.00 USD per year. The sales tax will be....23% and the profiteers can get a whole percentage to themselves( 22% of sales tax daily for the people and the system to keep it going and 1% daily for the profiteers and they can continue to pretend that it is the people's bread or the people's salted pork. But, why is anyone making people secretly offer half of their income support entitlement before they get even one pound? Where does the other half go? Its a bit too public; what ever it is going on and instead of asking us to agree to half in our emotions before you make payment, just send what you think is best and sent it to everyone who has applied; not once but four times? However, it is best you send the whole allotment due to the citizen on application and take the play dough of a whole 1% from the daily sales tax collection. Send the income support money actually to every citizen automatically or else there is a gender equality issue and some other criminal law issues. Do you know people who cannot rest until they put their spoon with their saliva in the food intended for guests at a bridal party banquet? Is there a uh.....profiteer some where who can now see how he can do what he does without bringing catastrophe attention on to himself? I would help him manage this if given the chance. Did you know Warren is an Anglican Church member? He is also a Pentecostal Church member, a Baptist and he will be joining the Presbyterians soon also. Did you know any ALUSRA (TM) idea now sells for $1300.00 per week on a 50 year deal? Contact us and we will read your terms in the MOU. If we say "yes", then you will send payment to us on a weekly basis with their being an opportunity to discuss and work out details of contract with a signing of the final contract to take place within 90 days when a lump sum draft for 20 years worth of payments is due. Once this payment is made, the contract termination date will change from its 50 year anniversary to its 30 year anniversary with the rights of ownership to finally pass on the date of the final payment. The buyer can continue to pay down the balance with lump sums until this final payment is made. This could be done on the 100th day if they so choose. Co ownership will ensue until that final payment is made and Mr. Lyon will participate in the design, conceptual and actual development of the idea and work as a company administrator. Click here.

Post a Comment