Pride and the Pride flag must stand for human equality regardless of race, creed or religion or orientation. It confirms that you are safe under the law as a human being regardless of your tendency toward self rejection or your tendency toward self mutilation. Aren't you essentially reconciled to Christ and the teachings of Mohammed that include Christ if you accept the symbolism and meaning of Pride except for the 1st commandment and the 1st commandment could be turned into the simple belief that we are all equal and are deserving of the space and dignity or forgiveness we give to our neighbor for stepping on our shoes or bumping into us on the subway or for barfing at the front of the hotel door or for using our essays or for accidentally denting our vehicle in car parking lots when they open their door as we deny ourselves; innit? But, Pride could not stand for a communal belief to do what ever you want in that the world owes you. No; the pride symbol confirms that you are a beneficiary of the magna carta but you are not communally in your orientation above the magna carta. The magna carta is much like the UN Charter as a non-religious document so to speak in purpose and it is still valid legislation. Many believers in the one God can see this. There are believers who are in the process of accepting their sexual orientation. I know I am not insisting that a man and a woman only could constitute human companionship in intimate relationships. It's just that on a logical point of view, I can guarantee you that you are not less likely to argue if you are of the same gender but you may avoid some issues of conflict that have been super imposed upon the simple logic of male and female interaction. You could never say men in relationships with other men do not struggle with the same fears of rejection that they may have encountered with a woman before they declared they were gay just to sense some kind of community. In fact, it seems that they may struggle now with two kinds of rejection although they usually take enough narcotics on average to mask their feelings and may struggle, even more so after their declarations, to respect their partner's or their neighbor's boundaries as to property and person. They tend to poison each other quite a lot for fear of competition. But, is it that you said you wanted from a woman? Now, if you could find a woman who could respect the power of intimacy and companionship in its true value for the one minute of coitus without the centrifugal and unnatural expectations imposed by the media, then you would be right where you are right now in someone's A"" except but that the end result of being with the woman is that you would reproduce. This is good maybe I think that you reproduce. You must know German people have taken all the world's coffee reserves and sold you a lot of hell on video also to make money off your evident predilection to be told what to do. But, what do you think? They are trading on one minute with their committed partner, either common law or registered union, and they also sell you lots of vehicles because they have more time to meditate on good design and less energy is spent on family division and the communal adulteration which really is house hold adulteration and they see less of this per capita. But, could someone take over this symbol and turn it into a symbol of anti-Christ or anti human community or anti peace or anti religion since how could we have community as all of God's children under this alleged banner of peace if....what do you think?

Pride and the Pride flag must stand for human equality regardless of race, creed or religion or orientation.  It confirms that you are safe under the law as a human being regardless of your tendency toward self rejection or your tendency toward self mutilation. Aren't you essentially reconciled to Christ and the teachings of Mohammed that include Christ if you accept the symbolism and meaning of Pride except for the 1st commandment and the 1st commandment could be turned into the simple belief that we are all equal and are deserving of the space and dignity or forgiveness we give to our neighbor for stepping on our shoes or bumping into us on the subway or for barfing at the front of the hotel door or for using our essays or for accidentally denting our vehicle in car parking lots when they open their door as we deny ourselves; innit?   But, Pride  could not stand for a communal belief to do what ever you want in that the world owes you. No; the pride symbol confirms that you are a beneficiary of the magna carta but you are not communally in your orientation above the magna carta.   The magna carta is much like the UN Charter as a non-religious document so to speak in purpose and it is still valid legislation.  Many believers in the one God can see this.  There are believers who are in the process of accepting their sexual orientation.  I know I am not insisting that a man and a woman only could constitute human companionship in intimate relationships. It's just that on a logical point of view, I can guarantee you that you are not less likely to argue if you are of the same gender but you may avoid some issues of conflict that have been super imposed upon the simple logic of male and female interaction. You could never say men in relationships with other men do not struggle with the same fears of rejection that they may have encountered with a woman before they declared they were gay just to sense some kind of community. In fact, it seems that they may struggle now with two kinds of rejection although they usually take enough narcotics on average to mask their feelings and may struggle, even more so after their declarations,  to respect their partner's or their neighbor's boundaries as to property and person. They tend to poison each other quite a lot for fear of competition. But, is it that you said you wanted from a woman?  Now, if you could find a woman who could respect the power of intimacy and companionship in its true value for the one minute of coitus without the centrifugal and unnatural expectations imposed by the media, then you would be right where you are right now in someone's A"" except but that the end result of being with the woman is that you would reproduce.  This is good maybe I think that you reproduce.  You must know German people have taken all the world's coffee reserves and sold you a lot of hell on video also to make money off your evident predilection to be told what to do.  But, what do you think? They are trading on one minute with their committed partner, either common law or registered union, and they also sell you lots of vehicles because they have more time to meditate on good design and less energy is spent on family division and the communal adulteration which really is house hold adulteration and they see less of this per capita.    But, could someone take over this symbol and turn it into a symbol of anti-Christ or anti human community or anti peace or anti religion since how could we have community as all of God's children under this alleged banner of peace if....what do you think?