So, they gave a young black a withdrawal of charges on a murder charge; a good thing! There was no evidence of the offence being committed and any evidence to suggest fell far below proof beyond a reasonable doubt but within the ambit of the balance of probability; Dane Prichards! But, the Jamaica people who do not think of themselves as white or black but as people from Hellshire and Kingston but now living in the deep north of North America were always happy to share their stash and their foods with the black people and vice versa but needed to be equal with the Black people for all time immemorial. So, when the young black man got the withdrawal of charges, they went after the Judge to kill because they needed to be equal. But, this is the question. Everybody is entitled to hope, seek and pray for his withdrawal of charges before the Monarch's honourable Court that is predicated on protecting the Monarch's peace and a wrongful conviction under the law is just as much of an offence to upset her peace as it is a theft of one's quiet enjoyment of his various freedoms under the magna carta.
So, they gave a young black a withdrawal of charges on a murder charge; a good thing! There was no evidence of the offence being committed and any evidence to suggest fell far below proof beyond a reasonable doubt but within the ambit of the balance of probability; Dane Prichards! But, the Jamaica people who do not think of themselves as white or black but as people from Hellshire and Kingston but now living in the deep north of North America were always happy to share their stash and their foods with the black people and vice versa but needed to be equal with the Black people for all time immemorial. So, when the young black man got the withdrawal of charges, they went after the Judge to kill because they needed to be equal. But, this is the question. Everybody is entitled to hope, seek and pray for his withdrawal of charges before the Monarch's honourable Court that is predicated on protecting the Monarch's peace and a wrongful conviction under the law is just as much of an offence to upset her peace as it is a theft of one's quiet enjoyment of his various freedoms under the magna carta. A theft is the appropriation of property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of that property contrary to the Queen's peace. SEE the OAPA 1861 and its codification on theft in addition to codification in various jurisdictions. Who pays a government employee money to commit an offense contrary to the Queen's peace in any jurisdiction?
Comments
Post a Comment